OctoberTerm2014SupremeCourtSignedOpinions

Dec/Arg Name of Case (October Term 2014) Disp L.Ct. Cn S/P/J Cr Ka So Gi Br Ke Ro Al Sc Th Total
1 12-9/10-8 Integrity Staffing v Busk--FSLA screenings D R 9 S C C x x x x x x X 9 to 0
2 12-9/10-8 Warger v Shauers--FRE 606(b) juror A 8 P x X x x x x x x x 9 to 0
3 12-15/10-6 Heien v North Carolina--4thA, traffic stop A NCSCt X X C D C x x X x x x 8 to 1
4 12-15/10-7 Dart Cherokee v Owens--28:1446 removal VR 10 P D x X x D x x D D 5 to 4
5 12-15/NO US v California--submerged land boundaries SupDec Orig 9 to 0
6 1-13/11-4 Jesinoski v Countrywide--15:1635 resciss. SJ RR 8 S/P x x x x x x x X x 9 to 0
7 1-13/12-2 Whitfield v US--18:2113, forced accomp IFP A 4 S X x x x x x x x X x 9 to 0
8 1-14/10-15 Jennings v Stephens--h.c. appeals IFP RR 5 S/P X x x x x D x D X D 6 to 3
9 1-14/11-10 T-Mobile v Roswell--47:332, notice RR 11 S/P x X D x x D C x D 6 to 3
10 1-20/10-15 Teva Pharm v Sandoz--35:112, std of rev VR FC P x x x X x x D x D 7 to 2
11 1-20/10-7 Holt v Hobbs--RLUIPA, prison beards IFP RR 8 S x C C x x x X x x 9 to 0
12 1-21/11-4 DHS v MacLean--TSA, whistleblower A FC S x D x x D X x x x 7 to 2
13 1-21/12-9 Gelboim v BCA--FRCP 54(b), 28: 1291, 1407 D RR 2 P x x X x x x x x x 9 to 0
14 1-21/12-3 Hana Fin v Hana Bank--trademrk tacking doct A 9 S/P x X x x x x x x x 9 to 0
15 1-26/11-10 M&G v Tackett--ERISA, CBA VR 6 P C C C C x x x x X 9 to 0
16 2-24/10-14 Kansas v Nebraska--RepRiverComp disgorge ExOv Orig X x x x x C,D C,D C,D C,D 5 to 4
17 2-25/10-14 NC Dental v FTC--state-action anti-trust imm A 4 P x x x x X D x D D 6 to 3
18 2-25/11-5 Yates v US--18:1519 crim stat interpretation RR 11 S X D x X x D CJ x D D (4+1) to 4
19 3-3/12-8 Direct Marketing v Brohl--28:1341 TIA SJ RR 10 S/J x C C C C x x x X 9 to 0
20 3-4/12-9 AlaDeptRev v CSX--tax discrimination RRRRA RR 11 S x x D x x x x X D 7 to 2
21 3-9/12-8 Dot v AARr--5thDP S/P Amtrak as gov entity VR DC X x x x x X x C x CJ (8+1) to 0
22 3-9/12-1 Perez v Mort Bankrs--APA ParalyzedVetsSJ 2 R DC S/P x x x x x x CCJ CJ CJ (6+3) to 0
23 3-9/NO Kansas v Nebraska--RepRiverComp disgorge Decree Orig
24 3-24/12-2 B&B v Hargis--trademrk issue preclusion RR 8 P/J x x C x x x X D D 7 to 2
25 3-24/11-3 Omnicare v LDCCIPF--SEC 15:77 D VR 6 S X x x x x x x CJ,C CJ (7+2) to 0
26 3-25/12-3 Young v UPS--Tit. 7 "issue of material fact" SJ VR 4 P x x x X D x CJ D D (5+1) to 3
27 3-25/11-12 Ala Black Caucus v Ala--VRA state legis 2 VR AlDC P x x x X x D D D D 5 to 4
28 3-31/1-20 Armstrong v Except Child--Medicaid SupCl SJ R 9 X S D D D CJ,C D x x X x (4+1) to 4
29 4-21/1-21 Rodrigues v US--4thA traff dogsniff Suppr IFP VR 8 X X x x X x D x D x D 6 to 3
30 4-21/1-12 Oneok v Learjet--no preemption SJ A 9 S x x x X x D x D CJ,C (6+1) to 2
Dec/Arg Name of Case (October Term 2014) Disp L.Ct. Cn S/P/J Cr Ka So Gi Br Ke Ro Al Sc Th Total
31 4-22/12-10 US v Wong--FTCA S/L 28:2401 tolling Dis 2 AR 9 S/P X x x x x D D D D 5 to 4
32 4-29/1-20 Williams-Yulee v FL Bar--1stA jud campaign $ A FLSCt X x x CJ,C C D X D D D (4+1) to 4
33 4-29/1-13 Mach Mining v EEOC--Title VII, jud.review VR 7 S/P X x x x x x x x x 9 to 0
34 5-4/4-1 Bullard v BlueHills--Bnkrptcy, appllble order A 1 S/P/J x x x x x X x x x 9 to 0
35 5-18/4-1 Harris v Viegelahn,Trustee--Ch7 v Ch 13 Bnkr RR 5 S x x X x x x x x x 9 to 0
36 5-18/2-24 Tibble v Edison Int--ERISA S/L D VR 9 S x x x X x x x x x 9 to 0
37 5-18/2-23 Coleman v Tollefson--28:1915 prisoner IFP 3 A 6 P x x x X x x x x x 9 to 0
38 5-18/11-12 Comptroller v Wynne--Md income tax CCl A MdCA X D x D x x x X D D 5 to 4
39 5-18/3-23 San Fran v Sheehan--ADA apply to arrests SJ D*RR 9 S C,D x x NP x x X C,D x (6+2) to 0
40 5-18/2-24 Henderson v US--felon firearms transfer D VR 11 S X X x x x x x x x x 9 to 0
41 5-26/3-31 Commil v Cisco Sys--induced patent infringe VR FC S/P x x x NP X D x D CJ* (5+1) to 2
42 5-26/1-13 Kellogg Brown v US--qui tam & WSLA S/L D RRA 4 S/P x x x x x x X x x 9 to 0
43 5-26/1-14 Wellness Int v Sharif--ch.7 bnkrptcy Art III D RR 7 X x X x x x D CCJ D D (5+1) to 3
44 6-1/12/1 Elonis v US--Int-net threats mens rea18:875c RR 3 S X x x x x x X C,D x D 7 to 2
45 6-1/2-25 EEOC v Abrcrmbie&Fitch--Muslimheadscarf RR 10 S x x x x x x CJ X C,D (7+1) to 1
46 6-1/3-24 Bank of America v Caulkett--ch.7 bnk 2 RR 11 S x CJ x CJ CJ x x x X (6+3) to 0
47 6-1/1-14 Mellouli v Lynch--INS deportation R 8 S x x X x x x D x D 7 to 2
48 6-8/11-3 Zivotofsky v Kerry--S/P, Art II, 3 A DC X x x x CJ X D D D CJ,D (4+1) to 4
49 6-15/2-23 Kerry v Din--visa denial D VR 9 S D D D D CJ x CJ X x (3+2) to 4
50 6-15/2-25 BakerBotts v ASARCO--ch.11 bnkrptcy attfee A 5 S D CCJ D D x x x x X (5+1) to 3
51 6-15/4-29 ReyesMata v Lynch--alien removal S/L RR 5 S/P X x x x x x x x D 8 to 1
52 6-18/1-12 Reed v TownofGilbert--1stA church signs DPI RR 9 X CJ C CJ CJ C x C x X (6+3) to 0
53 6-18/4-21 McFadden v US--scienter Analogue Act21:802 VR 4 S X x x x x x CCJ x x X (8+1) to 0
54 6-18/3-23 Walker v Confederate Vets--1stA lic. Plates R 5 X x x x X D D D D x 5 to 4
55 6-18/3-2 Ohio v Clark--6thA confrontation child Crawf RR SCtOH X X x x CJ x x x X CJ CJ (6+3) to 0
56 6-18/3-3 Davis v Ayala--14thEP, Batson, voirdire h.c. RR 9 X* S X D D D D C x X x C 5 to 4
57 6-18/3-30 Brumfield v Cain--cap pun mental Atkins h.c VR 5 X* S X x X x x x D D D D 5 to 4
58 6-22/4-22 Horne v DoA--5thA Taking raisin mkting order R 9 X C,D D C,D C,D x X x x C 5 to 4
59 6-22/4-27 Kingsley v Hendrickson--14thDP 28:1983 cops VR 7 X X x x x X x D D D D 5 to 4
60 6-22/3-3 LA v Patel--4thA facial challengeguestrecords A 9 X S x X x x x D D D D 5 to 4
Dec/Arg Name of Case (October Term 2014) Disp L.Ct. Cn S/P/J Cr Ka So Gi Br Ke Ro Al Sc Th Total
61 6-22/3-31 Kimble v Marvel--pat. stare decisis Brulotte A 9 S X x x x x D D x D 6 to 3
62 6-25/3-4 King v Burwell--Obamacare taxcredits D A 4 S x x x x x X D D D 6 to 3
63 6-25/1-21 Texas v ICP--FHA disparate impact AR 5 S x x x x X D D D D 5 to 4
64 6-26/4-20* Johnson v US--5thA DP 18:922, 924 ACCA RR 8 X X x x x x CJ x D X CJ (5+3) to 1
65 6-26/4-28 Obergefell v Hodges--14thEP, gay marriage 4 R 6 X x x x x X D D D D 5 to 4
66 6-29/3-2 AZ v AZ Comm--Elections Cl initiatives App A DCAz X x x X x x D D D D 5 to 4
67 6-29/4-29 Glossip v Gross--8thA cap pun drugs 1983 A 10 X X D D D D x x X C C 5 to 4
68 6-29/3-25 Michigan v EPA--agency interpretation 3 RR DC S D D D D x x x X C 5 to 4