| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2010) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Al | Ro | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 1 | 11-15/10-4 | Abbott v US--18:924(c), mand. Minimum (2) | A | 3,5 | S | X | NP | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 8 to 0 | |
| 2 | 11-30/10-5 | L.A.County v Humphries--1983, atty fees | RR | 9 | S/P | NP | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 3 | 1-11/11-8 | Mayo Fdn v US--IRS, resident MDs' FICA | A | 8 | S | NP | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 4 | 1-11/10-4 | Ransom v FIA Card Serv--bkrptcy "means" | A | 9 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | D | x | 8 to 1 | ||
| 5 | 1-19/10-12 | Harrington v Richter--hc 2254(d) ineff asst | RR | 9 | S | X | NP | CJ | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | (7+1) to 0 | |
| 6 | 1-19/10-12 | Premo v Moore--hc 2254(d) ineff assistance | RR | 9 | S | X | NP | CJ | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | (7+1) to 0 | |
| 7 | 1-19/10-5 | NASA v Nelson--rt to informational privacy | RR | 9 | X | NP | x | x | x | x | X | x | CJ | CJ | (6+2) to 0 | ||
| 8 | 1-24/12-7 | Thompson v NAS--Title VII, fiance retaliation SJ | RR | 6 | S | NP | x | C | C | x | x | x | X | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 9 | 1-24/11-1 | Ortiz v Jordan--1983, prisoner abuse SJ proc. | RR | 6 | P | x | x | X | x | CJ | x | x | CJ | CJ | (6+3) to 0 | ||
| 10 | 1-24/12-8 | Chase Bank v McCoy--Reg Z, class action D | RR | 9 | S | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 11 | 2-22/10-12 | Bruesewitz v Wyeth--no fault vaccine law SJ | A | 3 | S | NP | D | D | CJ | x | x | x | X | x | (5+1) to 2 | ||
| 12 | 2-22/11-10 | CSX v Ala Dept of Rev--discriminatory tax D | RR | 11 | S | X | x | D | x | x | x | x | x | D | 7 to 2 | ||
| 13 | 2-23/11-29 | Walker v Martin--st ct h.c. procedures | R | 9 | S | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 14 | 2-23/11-3 | Williamson v Mazda--preemption seat blt tort D | R | CaAp | S | NP | C | x | X | x | x | x | x | CJ | (7+1) to 0 | ||
| 15 | 2-28/10-5 | Mich. V Bryant--6thA testimonial statements | VR | SCtMi | X | X | NP | X | D | x | x | x | x | D | CJ | (5+1) to 2 | |
| 16 | 3-1/1-19 | FCC v AT&T--FOIA Exemption 7C Admin review | R | 3 | S | NP | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 17 | 3-1/11-2 | Staub v Proctor--USERRA liability | RR | 7 | NP | x | x | x | x | CJ | x | X | CJ | (6+2) to 0 | |||
| 18 | 3-1/12-6 | Henderson v Shinseki--S/L not "jurisdictional" | RR | FC | S/J | NP | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 19 | 3-2/10-6 | Snyder v Phelps--1stA, Westboro Baptists | A | 4 | X | x | x | x | C | x | D | x | x | x | 8 to 1 | ||
| 20 | 3-2/12-6 | Pepper v U.S.--sentencing IFP | VAR | 8 | P | X | NP | X | x | CCJ | x | CCJD | x | x | D | (5+1) to 2 | |
| 21 | 3-7/10-13 | Skinner v Switzer--DNA testing, 42:1983 D IFP | RR | 5 | X | x | x | X | x | D | D | x | x | D | 6 to 3 | ||
| 22 | 3-7/11-29 | Wall v Kholi--tolling S/L under AEDPA fed. h.c. | A | 1 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | C | x | 9 to 0 | |
| 23 | 3-7/12-1 | Milner v Dof Navy--FOIA Exemption 2, munitions | RR | 9 | S | X | x | x | D | x | C | x | x | x | 8 to 1 | ||
| 24 | 3-22/10-13 | Kasten v Saint-Gobain--FLSA retaliation SJ | VR | 7 | S | NP | x | x | X | x | x | x | D | D | 6 to 2 | ||
| 25 | 3-22/1-10 | Matrixx v Siracusano--Rule 10b & 10b-5 D | A | 9 | S | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 26 | 3-29/10-6 | Connick, D.A. v Thompson--1983, Brady, stds | R | 5 | S | X | D | D | D | D | x | C | x | C | X | 5 to 4 | |
| 27 | 3-29/1-19 | Astra v Santa Clara County--Medicaid rebates | R | 9 | S | NP | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 28 | 4-4/11-3 | Az Christ School v Winn--taxpayer standing (2) | R | 9 | X | P | D | D | D | D | X | x | x | C | C | 5 to 4 | |
| 29 | 4-4/11-9 | Cullen v Pinholster--AEDPA, hc | R | 9 | S/P | X | D | D | D | C,D | x | CCJ | x | x | X | (4+1) to 4 | |
| 30 | 4-19/12-1 | VaOPA v Stewart--Ex parte Young sov immun | RR | 4 | S | NP | x | x | x | C | D | D | X | C | 6 to 2 | ||
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2010) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Al | Ro | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 31 | 4-20/11-2 | Sossamon v Tex--City of Boerne, RLUIPA, sov | A | 5 | X | NP | D | x | D | x | x | x | x | X | 6 to 2 | ||
| 32 | 4-26/11/1 | US v Tohono O'Odham--28:1500, concur juris | RR | FC | J | NP | CJ | D | CJ | X | x | x | x | x | (5+2) to 1 | ||
| 33 | 4-27/11-9 | AT&T v Concepcions--preemption | RR | 9 | X | D | D | D | D | x | x | x | X | C | 5 to 4 | ||
| 34 | 5-2/1-10 | Montana v Wyoming--water rights Exception | O | Orig | NP | x | x | x | x | x | x | D | X | 7 to 1 | |||
| 35 | 5-16/3-1 | Schindler Elev v Kirk--"report" qui tam D | RR | 2 | J | NP | D | D | D | x | x | x | x | X | 5 to 3 | ||
| 36 | 5-16/11-30 | Cigna Corp v Amara--ERISA | VR | 2 | J | x | NP | x | X | x | x | x | CJ | CJ | (6+2) to 0 | ||
| 37 | 5-16/1-12 | Kentucky v King--4thA exigent circumstances | RR | SCtKy | X | X | x | x | D | x | x | X | x | x | x | 8 to 1 | |
| 38 | 5-23/1-18 | Gen Dynamics v US--default, state secrets | VR | FC | P/J | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 39 | 5-23/11-30 | Brown v Plata--3 jdge ct, PRLA, prison condition | A | DCs | X | J | X | x | x | x | x | X | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 |
| 40 | 5-23/12-8 | Cham Commerce v Whiting--aliens, preemption | A | 9 | S | NP | D | D | D | x | x | X | x | CJ | (4+1) to 4 | ||
| 41 | 5-26/2-22 | US v Tinklenberg--Speedy Trial Act 18:3161 | A | 6 | S | X | NP | x | x | X | x | x | CCJ | CCJ | CCJ | (5+3) to 0 | |
| 42 | 5-26/3-29 | Fowler v US--18:1512, witness tampering IFP | VR | 11 | S | X | x | x | D | X | x | D | x | CJ | x | (6+1) to 2 | |
| 43 | 5-26/3-1 | Camreta v Greene--auth of ct to rev, mootness 2 | VR | 9 | P/J | X | CJ | x | CJ | D | x | x | x | C | (6+2) to 1 | ||
| 44 | 5-31/3-2 | Ashcroft v al-Kidd--4thA, 18:3144, qual imm | RR | 9 | X | X | NP | CJ | CJ | CJ | C | x | x | X | x | (5+3) to 0 | |
| 45 | 5-31/2-23 | Global Tech v SEB--patents, willful blindness | A | FC | S | x | x | x | x | D | X | x | x | x | 8 to 1 | ||
| 46 | 6-6/2-28 | Junior Univ v Roche--patents, Bayh-Dole Act | A | FC | S | x | C | D | D | x | X | x | x | x | 7 to 2 | ||
| 47 | 6-6/4-25 | EPJ Fund v Halliburton--Rule 10(b) suit, class a | VR | 5 | S | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 48 | 6-6/4-25 | McNeill v US--18:922 "serious drug offense" IFP | A | 4 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | |
| 49 | 6-6/3-22 | Fox v Vice--42:1988 atty fees | VR | 5 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 50 | 6-9/1-12 | Sykes v US--18:924 (ACCA), Plea IFP | A | 7 | S | X | D | x | D | x | X | x | x | D | CJ | (5+1) to 3 | |
| 51 | 6-9/3-30 | Talk America v Mich Bell--47:251(c)(3) | R | 6 | S | NP | x | x | x | x | x | x | C | X | 8 to 0 | ||
| 52 | 6-9/2-28 | DePierre v US--21:841 "cocaine base" | A | 1 | S | X | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | CCJ | x | (8+1) to 0 | |
| 53 | 6-9/4-18 | Microsoft v I4I LP--patent infringement | A | FC | S | x | X | x | C | x | C | NP | C | CJ | (7+1) to 1 | ||
| 54 | 6-13/4-27 | Nev Comm Ethics v Carrigan--recusal stat. 1stA | RR | NvSCt | X | x | x | x | x | C | CCJ | x | X | x | (8+1) to 0 | ||
| 55 | 6-13/12-7 | Janus Cap v 1st Derivative--10b-5 D | R | 4 | S | D | D | D | D | x | x | x | x | X | 5 to 4 | ||
| 56 | 6-13/4-20 | US v Jicarilla Apache--a-c priv, fid excp Motion | RR | FC | P | NP | D | CJ | CJ | x | X | x | x | x | (5+2) to 1 | ||
| 57 | 6-16/2-22 | Bond v US--standing, 10th A, 18:229 treaty D | RR | 3 | P | x | x | CJ | C | X | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 58 | 6-16/3-21 | Davis v US--4th exclusionary rule IFP | A | 11 | X | X | x | CJ | D | D | x | X | x | x | x | (6+1) to 2 | |
| 59 | 6-16/3-23 | JDB v North Carolina--Miranda juvenile IFP | RR | NCSCt | X | X | x | X | x | x | x | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | |
| 60 | 6-16/1-18 | Smith v Bayer Corp--injunctions state ct | R | 8 | P/J | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | [CJ] | (8+1) to 0 | ||
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2010) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Al | Ro | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 61 | 6-16/4-18 | Tapia v US--sentencing, rehabilitation IFP | RR | 9 | S | X | X | C | x | x | x | C | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | |
| 62 | 6-20/3-29 | Wal-Mart v Dukes--Rule 23 class cert | RR | 9 | P | C,D | C,D | C,D | C,D | x | x | x | X | x | 5 to 4 | ||
| 63 | 6-20/3-22 | Duryea v Guarnieri--1st A Petition Cl=lawsuit? | VR | 3 | X | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | CJ,D | CJ | (7+1) to 1 | ||
| 64 | 6-20/4-19 | AmElecPow v Conn--pol quest, stand fed C/L D | RR | 2 | J | x | NP | X | x | x | CCJ | x | x | CCJ | (6+2) to 0 | ||
| 65 | 6-20/3-23 | Turner v Rogers--mootness, 6th &14thA coun | VR | SCSCt | X | J | X | x | x | x | X | x | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 |
| 66 | 6-23/1-18 | Stern v Marshall--Art III, bankruptcy ct juris | A | 9 | X | D | D | D | D | x | x | X | C | x | 5 to 4 | ||
| 67 | 6-23/2-23 | Freeman v US--sent. Guidelines, pleas IFP | RR | 6 | S | X | x | CJ | x | x | X | D | D | D | D | (4+1) to 4 | |
| 68 | 6-23/4-26 | Sorrell, VtA-G v IMS Health--1stA | A | 2 | X | D | x | D | D | X | x | x | x | x | 6 to 3 | ||
| 69 | 6-23/3-30 | Pliva v Mensing--pre-emption 3 | RR | 8,5 | S | D | D | D | D | [CJ] | x | x | x | X | (4+1) to 4 | ||
| 70 | 6-23/3-2 | Bullcoming v NM--6thA Confront lab rept IFP | RR | NMSCt | X | X | [CJ] | C | X | D | D | D | D | x | [CJ] | (2+3) to 4 | |
| 71 | 6-23/3-28 | CSX v McBride--FELA, prox cause element | A | 7 | S | x | x | X | x | D | D | D | D | [CJ] | (4+!) to 4 | ||
| 72 | 6-27/3-28 | AZ PAC v Bennett--1stA state campaign finance 2 | R | 9 | X | D | D | D | D | x | x | X | x | x | 5 to 4 | ||
| 73 | 6-27/11-2 | Brown v EMA--1stA violent video games | A | 9 | X | x | x | x | D | x | CJ | CJ | X | D | (5+2) to 2 | ||
| 74 | 6-27/1-11 | McIntyre Mach v Nicastro--pers juris contacts DP | R | NJSCt | X | J | D | D | D | CJ | X | CJ | x | x | x | (4+2) to 3 | |
| 75 | 6-27/1-11 | GoodyearDunlop v Brown--pers juris | R | NCCA | X | J | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 |