| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2013) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Al | Ro | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 1 | 11-5/10-8 | Burt v Titlow--AEDPA std of fed review h.c. | R | 6 | S | X | x | C | CJ | x | x | X | x | x | x | (8+1) to 0 | |
| 2 | 12-3/10-9 | US v Woods--tax avoidance, TEFRA, jurisdiction | R | 5 | S/J | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 3 | 12-3/10-9 | Atlantic Marine v USDC--mandamus, forum selec | RR | 5 | P | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 4 | 12-10/11-5 | Sprint v Jacobs--Younger abstention doctrine Dis | R | 8 | J | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 5 | 12-11/10-16 | Kansas v Cheever--5th, Estelle, Buchanan mental | VR | SCtKS | X | X | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | |
| 6 | 12-16/10-15 | Heimeshoff v Hartford--ERISA limitations cl Dis | A | 2 | S | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | ||
| 7 | 1-14/10-15 | DaimlerAG v Bauman--DP, Alien Tort, per jur Dis | R | 9 | X | J | x | CJ | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | (8+1) to 0 | |
| 8 | 1-14/11-6 | Miss. V AU Optronics--"mass action" 28:§1332(d) | RR | 5 | J | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 9 | 1-15/12-9 | Haluch v [Unions]--untimely appeal FRAP | RR | 1 | P | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 10 | 1-22/11-5 | Medtronic v Mirowski--patent infringement bop | RR | FC | P/J | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 11 | 1-27/11-12 | Burrage v US--18:841, "but-for" causality IFP | RR | 8 | S | x | CJ | CJ | x | x | CJ | x | X | x | (6+3) to 0 | ||
| 12 | 1-27/11-4 | Sandifer v US Steel--"donning and doffing" SJ | A | 7 | S | x | CJ | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | (8+1) to 0 | ||
| 13 | 1-27/12-9 | Air Wisconsin v Hoeper--ATSA, defamation, priv | RR | SCtCO | S | A,D | X | x | x | x | x | x | A,D | A,D | 6 to 3 | ||
| 14 | 2-25/11-4 | Walden v Fiore--personal jurisdiction | R | 9 | J | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | ||
| 15 | 2-25/11-13 | Fernandez v Cal--4thA, Randolphsuppression IFP | A | CACal | X | X | D | D | D | x | x | X | x | C | C | 6 to 3 | |
| 16 | 2-25/10-16 | Kaley v. US--§853 pre-trial forfeiture DP, 6thA | AR | 11 | X | X | X | D | x | D | x | x | D | x | x | 6 to 3 | |
| 17 | 2-26/12-4 | US v Apel--18:1382, military base trespass | VR | 9 | S | X | x | C | C | x | x | C | X | x | x | 9 to 0 | |
| 18 | 2-26/10-7 | Chadbourne v Troice--15:78bb securities Dis 3 | A | 5 | S | x | x | x | X | D | D | x | x | C | 7 to 2 | ||
| 19 | 3-4/1-13 | Law v Siegel--bankruptcy law IFP | RR | 9 | S | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 20 | 3-4/11-12 | Lawson v FMR--Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblow Dis | RR | 1 | S | x | D | X | x | D | D | x | CPPCJ | CPPCJ | (4+2) to 3 | ||
| 21 | 3-5/12-11 | Lozano v Montoya--Child abduction treaty tolling | A | 2 | T | x | C | x | C | x | C | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | ||
| 22 | 3-5/12-2 | BG Group v Argentina--UK-AR treaty | R | DC | T | x | CJ | x | X | D | x | D | x | x | 6 to 3 | ||
| 23 | 3-5/11-12 | Rosemund v US--18:2, aiding and abetting | VR | 10 | S | X | X | x | x | x | x | C,D | x | CJ* | C,D | 7* to 2 | |
| 24 | 3-10/1-14 | BrandtTrust v US--Rails to Trails, easements SJ | RR | 10 | S | x | D | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | 8 to 1 | ||
| 25 | 3-25/12-3 | Lexmark v Static--Lanham Act standing Dis | A | 6 | S | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 26 | 3-25/1-14 | US v Quality Stores--Bankrptcy FICA tax SJ | RR | 6 | S | NP | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 27 | 3-26/1-15 | US v Castleman--18:922g9 "violence" Dis | RR | 6 | S | x | X | x | x | x | CJ | x | CCJ | CJ | (6+3) to 0 | ||
| 28 | 4-2/10-8 | McCutcheon v FEC--1stA BCRA contributions Dis | RR | DCDC | X | D | D | D | D | x | X | x | x | CJ | (4+1) to 4 | ||
| 29 | 4-2/12-3 | Northwest v Ginsberg--ADA preemption | RR | 9 | S | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 30 | 4-22/10-15 | Schuette v BAMN--14thEP, colleg aff action SJ | R | 6 | X | NP | D | D | CJ | X | x | x | CJ | CJ | (3+3) to 2 | ||
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2011) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Al | Ro | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 31 | 4-22/1-21 | Prado v CA--4thA traffic stop, suppression IFP | A | CACal | X | X | D | D | D | x | x | x | x | D | X | 5 to 4 | |
| 32 | 4-23/12-11 | White v Woodall--5thA no inference instr hc | RR | 6 | X | X | x | D | D | D | x | x | x | X | x | 6 to 3 | |
| 33 | 4-23/1-22 | Paroline v US--18:2259 prox cause writ mand IFP | VR | 5 | S | X | x | D | x | x | X | x | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | |
| 34 | 4-29/12-10 | EPA v Homer City--stat. auth.agency 2 | RR | DC | S | x | x | X | x | x | NP | x | D | D | 6 to 2 | ||
| 35 | 4-29/2-26 | Octane v Icon--35:393 inherent jud power SJ | RR | FC | S | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | CJ | x | (8+1) to 0 | ||
| 36 | 4-29/2-26 | Highmark v Allcare--35:285 fee shifting Octane | VR | FC | S | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 37 | 5-5/11-6 | Town of Greece v Galloway--1stA Establish SJ | R | 2 | X | D | D | D | D | X | C | x | CCJ | CCJ | (3+2) to 4 | ||
| 38 | 5-5/2-25 | Robers v US--18:3663 crim restitution IFP | A | 7 | S | x | C | C | X | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 39 | 5-19/1-21 | Petrella v MGM--Raging Bull, copyright, laches D | RR | 9 | S/P | x | x | X | D | D | x | D | x | x | 6 to 3 | ||
| 40 | 5-27/3-3 | Hall v Florida--8th, 14th cap punish IQ71 IFP | RR | SCtFla | X | X | x | x | x | x | X | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | |
| 41 | 5-27/3-26 | Wood v Moss--1stA Bivens viewpoint discrim Dis | R | 9 | X | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 42 | 5-27/3-4 | Plumhoff v Rickard--4thA 1983 SJ | RR | 6 | X | X | x | x | CJ | CJ | x | X | x | x | x | (7+2) to 0 | |
| 43 | 5-27/12-2 | Michigan v Bay Mills--tribal sov immunity | AR | 6 | X | C | D | x | x | D | x | D | D | 5 to 4 | |||
| 44 | 6-2/11-5 | Bond v US--18:229 chem weapons simple assault | RR | 3 | X | X | x | x | x | x | x | CJ | X | CJ | CJ | (6+3) to 0 | |
| 45 | 6-2/4-28 | Nautilus v Biosig--35:112 Patent Act SJ | VR | FC | X | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 46 | 6-2/4-30 | Limelight v Akamai--35: 271 patent infringement | RR | FC | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 47 | 6-9/4-23 | CTS Corp v Waldburger--42:9658 S/L preempt Dis | R | 4 | X | x | x | D | D | X | CCJ | CCJ | CCJ | CCJ | (3+4) to 2 | ||
| 48 | 6-9/1-14 | Exec Benefits v Arkison--Art III Stern clms S/P | A | 3 | X | J | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | |
| 49 | 6-9/12-10 | Scialabba v Cuellar--8:1153A INA SJ | RR | 9 | S | X | D | x | D | x | D | CJ | CJ | D | (3+2) to 4 | ||
| 50 | 6-12/4-21 | POM Wonderful v Coca-Cola--statute conflict SJ | RR | 9 | S | x | x | x | NP | X | x | x | x | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 51 | 6-12/3-24 | Clark et ux v Rameker--Chapter 7, inhereted IRAs | A | 7 | S | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 52 | 6-16/4-21 | Argentina v NML--FSIA, post-jment discovery | A | 2 | S | x | NP | D | x | x | x | x | X | x | 7 to 1 | ||
| 53 | 6-16/4-22 | Susan B Anthony v Driehaus--Art III standing Dis | RR | 6 | X | J | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | |
| 54 | 6-16/1-22 | Abramski v US--Gun purchases | A | 4 | S | X | x | x | x | x | D | D | D | D | 5to 4 | ||
| 55 | 6-23/3-5 | Halliburton v Erica John--class action certification | VR | 5 | P | x | C | C | C | x | X | CJ | CJ | CJ | (6+3) to 0 | ||
| 56 | 6-23/2-24 | Utility Air Reg v EPA--air pollution regs Dis 6 | AR | DC | S | CD | CD | CD | CD | x | x | CD | X | CD | (3+4+2) | ||
| 57 | 6-23/4-1 | Loughrin v US--18:1344 bank fraud intent | A | 10 | S | X | X | x | x | x | x | x | CCJ | CCJ | x | (7+2) to 0 | |
| 58 | 5-25/4-22 | ABC v Aereo--17:106(4) Transmit Clause | RR | 2 | S | x | x | x | X | x | x | D | D | D | 6 to 3 | ||
| 59 | 6-25/4-2 | Fifth Third v Dudenhoeffer--ESOP ERISA Dis | VR | 6 | S | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 60 | 6-25/4-29 | Riley v CA--4th A, search cell phones wo warrant 2 | RR,A | CalCA | X | X | x | x | x | x | x | X | CCJ | x | x | (8+1) to 0 | |
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2011) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Al | Ro | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 61 | 6-26/1-13 | NLRB v Canning--Recess Appointments Cl | A | DC | X | x | x | x | X | x | CJ | CJ | CJ | CJ | (5+4) to 0 | ||
| 62 | 6-30/3-25 | Burwell v Hobby Lobby--RFRA v ACA 2 | A, RR | 10 | S | D | D | D | D | C | X | x | x | x | 5 to 4 | ||
| 63 | 6-30/1-21 | Harris v Quinn--1stA, Medicaid, union dues | R | 7 | X | D | D | D | D | x | X | x | x | x | 5 to 4 |