| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2014) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Ro | Al | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 1 | 12-9/10-8 | Integrity Staffing v Busk--FSLA screenings D | R | 9 | S | C | C | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | ||
| 2 | 12-9/10-8 | Warger v Shauers--FRE 606(b) juror | A | 8 | P | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 3 | 12-15/10-6 | Heien v North Carolina--4thA, traffic stop | A | NCSCt | X | X | C | D | C | x | x | X | x | x | x | 8 to 1 | |
| 4 | 12-15/10-7 | Dart Cherokee v Owens--28:1446 removal | VR | 10 | P | D | x | X | x | D | x | x | D | D | 5 to 4 | ||
| 5 | 12-15/NO | US v California--submerged land boundaries | SupDec | Orig | 9 to 0 | ||||||||||||
| 6 | 1-13/11-4 | Jesinoski v Countrywide--15:1635 resciss. SJ | RR | 8 | S/P | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 7 | 1-13/12-2 | Whitfield v US--18:2113, forced accomp IFP | A | 4 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | 9 to 0 | |
| 8 | 1-14/10-15 | Jennings v Stephens--h.c. appeals IFP | RR | 5 | S/P | X | x | x | x | x | D | x | D | X | D | 6 to 3 | |
| 9 | 1-14/11-10 | T-Mobile v Roswell--47:332, notice | RR | 11 | S/P | x | X | D | x | x | D | C | x | D | 6 to 3 | ||
| 10 | 1-20/10-15 | Teva Pharm v Sandoz--35:112, std of rev | VR | FC | P | x | x | x | X | x | x | D | x | D | 7 to 2 | ||
| 11 | 1-20/10-7 | Holt v Hobbs--RLUIPA, prison beards IFP | RR | 8 | S | x | C | C | x | x | x | X | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 12 | 1-21/11-4 | DHS v MacLean--TSA, whistleblower | A | FC | S | x | D | x | x | D | X | x | x | x | 7 to 2 | ||
| 13 | 1-21/12-9 | Gelboim v BCA--FRCP 54(b), 28: 1291, 1407 D | RR | 2 | P | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 14 | 1-21/12-3 | Hana Fin v Hana Bank--trademrk tacking doct | A | 9 | S/P | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 15 | 1-26/11-10 | M&G v Tackett--ERISA, CBA | VR | 6 | P | C | C | C | C | x | x | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | ||
| 16 | 2-24/10-14 | Kansas v Nebraska--RepRiverComp disgorge | ExOv | Orig | X | x | x | x | x | C,D | C,D | C,D | C,D | 5 to 4 | |||
| 17 | 2-25/10-14 | NC Dental v FTC--state-action anti-trust imm | A | 4 | P | x | x | x | x | X | D | x | D | D | 6 to 3 | ||
| 18 | 2-25/11-5 | Yates v US--18:1519 crim stat interpretation | RR | 11 | S | X | D | x | X | x | D | CJ | x | D | D | (4+1) to 4 | |
| 19 | 3-3/12-8 | Direct Marketing v Brohl--28:1341 TIA SJ | RR | 10 | S/J | x | C | C | C | C | x | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | ||
| 20 | 3-4/12-9 | AlaDeptRev v CSX--tax discrimination RRRRA | RR | 11 | S | x | x | D | x | x | x | x | X | D | 7 to 2 | ||
| 21 | 3-9/12-8 | Dot v AARr--5thDP S/P Amtrak as gov entity | VR | DC | X | x | x | x | x | X | x | C | x | CJ | (8+1) to 0 | ||
| 22 | 3-9/12-1 | Perez v Mort Bankrs--APA ParalyzedVetsSJ 2 | R | DC | S/P | x | x | x | x | x | x | CCJ | CJ | CJ | (6+3) to 0 | ||
| 23 | 3-9/NO | Kansas v Nebraska--RepRiverComp disgorge | Decree | Orig | |||||||||||||
| 24 | 3-24/12-2 | B&B v Hargis--trademrk issue preclusion | RR | 8 | P/J | x | x | C | x | x | x | X | D | D | 7 to 2 | ||
| 25 | 3-24/11-3 | Omnicare v LDCCIPF--SEC 15:77 D | VR | 6 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | CJ,C | CJ | (7+2) to 0 | ||
| 26 | 3-25/12-3 | Young v UPS--Tit. 7 "issue of material fact" SJ | VR | 4 | P | x | x | x | X | D | x | CJ | D | D | (5+1) to 3 | ||
| 27 | 3-25/11-12 | Ala Black Caucus v Ala--VRA state legis 2 | VR | AlDC | P | x | x | x | X | x | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | ||
| 28 | 3-31/1-20 | Armstrong v Except Child--Medicaid SupCl SJ | R | 9 | X | S | D | D | D | CJ,C | D | x | x | X | x | (4+1) to 4 | |
| 29 | 4-21/1-21 | Rodrigues v US--4thA traff dogsniff Suppr IFP | VR | 8 | X | X | x | x | X | x | D | x | D | x | D | 6 to 3 | |
| 30 | 4-21/1-12 | Oneok v Learjet--no preemption SJ | A | 9 | S | x | x | x | X | x | D | x | D | CJ,C | (6+1) to 2 | ||
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2014) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Ro | Al | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 31 | 4-22/12-10 | US v Wong--FTCA S/L 28:2401 tolling Dis 2 | AR | 9 | S/P | X | x | x | x | x | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | ||
| 32 | 4-29/1-20 | Williams-Yulee v FL Bar--1stA jud campaign $ | A | FLSCt | X | x | x | CJ,C | C | D | X | D | D | D | (4+1) to 4 | ||
| 33 | 4-29/1-13 | Mach Mining v EEOC--Title VII, jud.review | VR | 7 | S/P | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 34 | 5-4/4-1 | Bullard v BlueHills--Bnkrptcy, appllble order | A | 1 | S/P/J | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 35 | 5-18/4-1 | Harris v Viegelahn,Trustee--Ch7 v Ch 13 Bnkr | RR | 5 | S | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 36 | 5-18/2-24 | Tibble v Edison Int--ERISA S/L D | VR | 9 | S | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 37 | 5-18/2-23 | Coleman v Tollefson--28:1915 prisoner IFP 3 | A | 6 | P | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 38 | 5-18/11-12 | Comptroller v Wynne--Md income tax CCl | A | MdCA | X | D | x | D | x | x | x | X | D | D | 5 to 4 | ||
| 39 | 5-18/3-23 | San Fran v Sheehan--ADA apply to arrests SJ | D*RR | 9 | S | C,D | x | x | NP | x | x | X | C,D | x | (6+2) to 0 | ||
| 40 | 5-18/2-24 | Henderson v US--felon firearms transfer D | VR | 11 | S | X | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | |
| 41 | 5-26/3-31 | Commil v Cisco Sys--induced patent infringe | VR | FC | S/P | x | x | x | NP | X | D | x | D | CJ* | (5+1) to 2 | ||
| 42 | 5-26/1-13 | Kellogg Brown v US--qui tam & WSLA S/L D | RRA | 4 | S/P | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 43 | 5-26/1-14 | Wellness Int v Sharif--ch.7 bnkrptcy Art III D | RR | 7 | X | x | X | x | x | x | D | CCJ | D | D | (5+1) to 3 | ||
| 44 | 6-1/12/1 | Elonis v US--Int-net threats mens rea18:875c | RR | 3 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | X | C,D | x | D | 7 to 2 | |
| 45 | 6-1/2-25 | EEOC v Abrcrmbie&Fitch--Muslimheadscarf | RR | 10 | S | x | x | x | x | x | x | CJ | X | C,D | (7+1) to 1 | ||
| 46 | 6-1/3-24 | Bank of America v Caulkett--ch.7 bnk 2 | RR | 11 | S | x | CJ | x | CJ | CJ | x | x | x | X | (6+3) to 0 | ||
| 47 | 6-1/1-14 | Mellouli v Lynch--INS deportation | R | 8 | S | x | x | X | x | x | x | D | x | D | 7 to 2 | ||
| 48 | 6-8/11-3 | Zivotofsky v Kerry--S/P, Art II, §3 | A | DC | X | x | x | x | CJ | X | D | D | D | CJ,D | (4+1) to 4 | ||
| 49 | 6-15/2-23 | Kerry v Din--visa denial D | VR | 9 | S | D | D | D | D | CJ | x | CJ | X | x | (3+2) to 4 | ||
| 50 | 6-15/2-25 | BakerBotts v ASARCO--ch.11 bnkrptcy attfee | A | 5 | S | D | CCJ | D | D | x | x | x | x | X | (5+1) to 3 | ||
| 51 | 6-15/4-29 | ReyesMata v Lynch--alien removal S/L | RR | 5 | S/P | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | D | 8 to 1 | ||
| 52 | 6-18/1-12 | Reed v TownofGilbert--1stA church signs DPI | RR | 9 | X | CJ | C | CJ | CJ | C | x | C | x | X | (6+3) to 0 | ||
| 53 | 6-18/4-21 | McFadden v US--scienter Analogue Act21:802 | VR | 4 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | CCJ | x | x | X | (8+1) to 0 | |
| 54 | 6-18/3-23 | Walker v Confederate Vets--1stA lic. Plates | R | 5 | X | x | x | x | X | D | D | D | D | x | 5 to 4 | ||
| 55 | 6-18/3-2 | Ohio v Clark--6thA confrontation child Crawf | RR | SCtOH | X | X | x | x | CJ | x | x | x | X | CJ | CJ | (6+3) to 0 | |
| 56 | 6-18/3-3 | Davis v Ayala--14thEP, Batson, voirdire h.c. | RR | 9 | X* | S | X | D | D | D | D | C | x | X | x | C | 5 to 4 |
| 57 | 6-18/3-30 | Brumfield v Cain--cap pun mental Atkins h.c | VR | 5 | X* | S | X | x | X | x | x | x | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 |
| 58 | 6-22/4-22 | Horne v DoA--5thA Taking raisin mkting order | R | 9 | X | C,D | D | C,D | C,D | x | X | x | x | C | 5 to 4 | ||
| 59 | 6-22/4-27 | Kingsley v Hendrickson--14thDP 28:1983 cops | VR | 7 | X | X | x | x | x | X | x | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | |
| 60 | 6-22/3-3 | LA v Patel--4thA facial challengeguestrecords | A | 9 | X | S | x | X | x | x | x | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | |
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2014) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Ro | Al | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 61 | 6-22/3-31 | Kimble v Marvel--pat. stare decisis Brulotte | A | 9 | S | X | x | x | x | x | D | D | x | D | 6 to 3 | ||
| 62 | 6-25/3-4 | King v Burwell--Obamacare taxcredits D | A | 4 | S | x | x | x | x | x | X | D | D | D | 6 to 3 | ||
| 63 | 6-25/1-21 | Texas v ICP--FHA disparate impact | AR | 5 | S | x | x | x | x | X | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | ||
| 64 | 6-26/4-20* | Johnson v US--5thA DP 18:922, 924 ACCA | RR | 8 | X | X | x | x | x | x | CJ | x | D | X | CJ | (5+3) to 1 | |
| 65 | 6-26/4-28 | Obergefell v Hodges--14thEP, gay marriage 4 | R | 6 | X | x | x | x | x | X | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | ||
| 66 | 6-29/3-2 | AZ v AZ Comm--Elections Cl initiatives App | A | DCAz | X | x | x | X | x | x | D | D | D | D | 5 to 4 | ||
| 67 | 6-29/4-29 | Glossip v Gross--8thA cap pun drugs §1983 | A | 10 | X | X | D | D | D | D | x | x | X | C | C | 5 to 4 | |
| 68 | 6-29/3-25 | Michigan v EPA--agency interpretation 3 | RR | DC | S | D | D | D | D | x | x | x | X | C | 5 to 4 |