| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2015) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Ro | Al | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 1 | 12-1/10-5 | Personenverkehr v Sachs--FSIA, tkt Dis | R | 9 | S | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 2 | 12-8/11-4 | Shapiro v McManus 29:2284 3jdge ct Dis | RR | 4 | S/J | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 3 | 12-14/10-6 | DirecTV v Imburgia--arb cl, law of state | RR | CalCA | S | x | D | D | X | x | x | x | x | x | 7 to 2 | ||
| 4 | 1-12/11-4 | Bruce v Samuels--28:1915 prisoner litig | A | DC | S | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 5 | 1-12/10-13 | Hurst v FL--cap pun law, Ring, 6thA IFP | RR | FLSCt | X | X | x | X | x | CJ | x | x | D | x | x | (7+1) to 1 | |
| 6 | 1-20/10-7 | KS v Carr--cap pun law 8th (3) | RR | KSSCt | X | X | x | D | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | 8 to 1 | |
| 7 | 1-20/11-9 | Montanile v NEIHBP--ERISA reimburse | RR | 11 | S | x | x | D | x | x | x | C | x | X | 8 to 1 | ||
| 8 | 1-20/10-14 | Campbell-Ewald v Gomez--47:227 texting SJ | AR | 9 | X | J/P | x | x | X | x | x | D | D | D | CJ | 5 to 4 | |
| 9 | 1-25/10-13 | Montgomery v LA--minor life w/o parole 8th | RR | LASCt | X | X | x | x | x | x | X | x | D | D | D | 6 to 3 | |
| 10 | 1-25/11-30 | Musacchio v US--hacking, S/L & sufficiency | A | 5 | P | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | 9 to 0 | |
| 11 | 1-25/12-1 | Menominee Indians v US--S/L, equit tolling | A | DC | P | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | 9 to 0 | ||
| 12 | 1-25/10-14 | FERC v EPSA--APA rule-making (2) | RR | DC | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | NP | D | D | 6 to 2 | ||
| 13 | 3-1/12-2 | Gobeille v Liberty Mutual--ERISA, preempt SJ | A | 2 | S | x | D | D | C | X | x | x | NP | C | 6 to 2 | ||
| 14 | 3-1/11-3 | Lockhart v US--18:2252, stat construction IFP | A | 2 | S | X | D | X | x | D | x | x | x | NP | x | 6 to 2 | |
| 15 | 3-7/1-19 | Americold v ConAgra--28:1332, trust, share | A | 10 | J | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | NP | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 16 | 3-21/NO | Montana v ND & WY--Water rights | O | 8 to 0 | |||||||||||||
| 17 | 3-22/1-20 | Sturgeon v Frost--ANILCA SJ | VR | 9 | S | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | NP | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 18 | 3-22/11-10 | Tyson Fds. v Bouaphakeo--FLSA don & doff | AR | 8 | S | x | x | x | x | X | C | C,D | NP | D | 6 to 2 | ||
| 19 | 3-22/1-20 | NE v Parker--"diminishment" of res | A | 8 | S | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | NP | X | 8 to 0 | ||
| 20 | 3-30/11-10 | Luis v US--frozen assets, atty fees 6thA | VR | 11 | X | X | D | x | x | X | D | x | D | NP | CJ | (4+1) to 3 | |
| 21 | 4-4/12-8 | Evenwel v Abbott--EP, VEP v VAP districting | A | WDTx | X | x | x | X | x | x | x | CJ | NP | CJ | 6 to 2 | ||
| 22 | 4-4/3-1 | Nichols v US--SORNA, sex offender regis IFP | R | 10 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | X | NP | x | 8 to 0 | |
| 23 | 4-18/3-30 | Welch v US--retroactivity h.c. IFP | VR | 11 | S | X | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | NP | D | 7 to 1 | |
| 24 | 4-19/2-24 | Hughes v Talen Energy--FERC preempt (2) | A | 4 | S | x | C | X | x | x | x | x | NP | CCJ | (7+1) to 0 | ||
| 25 | 4-19/12-7 | Franchise Tx Cal v Hyatt--FF&C | VR | SCtNV | X | x | x | x | X | x | D | CJ | NP | D | (5+1) to 2 | ||
| 26 | 4-20/1-12 | Molina-Martinez v US--sentencing appeal IFP | RR | 5 | P | X | x | x | x | x | X | x | CCJ | NP | CCJ | (6+2) to 0 | |
| 27 | 4-20/1-13 | Bank Markazi v Peterson--S/P | A | 2 | X | x | D | X | x | x | D | x | NP | C | 6 to 2 | ||
| 28 | 4-20/12-8 | Harris v AZ Redistrict Comm--EP | A | D AZ | X | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | NP | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 29 | 4-26/1-19 | Heffernan v Paterson--Ee demoted , 1stA | RR | 3 | X | x | x | x | X | x | x | D | NP | D | 6 to 2 | ||
| 30 | 5-2/10-6 | Ocasio v US--Hobbs Act extortion, conspiracy | A | 4 | S | X | x | D | x | C | x | D | X | NP | D | 5 to 3 | |
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2015) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Ro | Al | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 31 | 5-16/3-29 | Sheriff v Gillie--state agents Debt Coll SJ | RR | 6 | S | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | NP | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 32 | 5-16/11-2 | Spokeo v Robins--Art III standing D | VR | 9 | X | J | x | D | D | x | x | X | x | NP | C | 6 to 2 | |
| 33 | 5-16/3-1 | Husky Elec v Ritz--Bkrptcy "actual fraud" | RR | 5 | S | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | NP | D | 7 to 1 | ||
| 34 | 5-16/12-1 | MerrillLynch v Manning--§1331 Motion | A | 3 | J | X | CJ | x | x | x | x | x | NP | CJ | (6+2) to 0 | ||
| 35 | 5-19/3-28 | CRST v EEOC--D's atty fees Ps dismissed | VR | 8 | S | x | x | x | x | X | x | x | NP | C | 8 to 0 | ||
| 36 | 5-19/3-28 | Betterman v MT--6thA post-conv speedy trial | A | SCtMT | X | X | x | C | X | x | x | x | C | NP | C | 8 to 0 | |
| 37 | 5-19/11-3 | LunaTorres v Lynch--fed-state crimes (CCl) | A | 2 | S | X | X | D | x | D | x | x | x | NP | D | 5 to 3 | |
| 38 | 5-23/11-2 | Foster v Chatman--Batson 14thDP, statehc IFP | RR | SCtGA | X | J | X | x | x | x | x | x | X | CJ | NP | D | (6+1) to 1 |
| 39 | 5-23/3-21 | Wittman v Personhubullah--Art III standing | Dis | EDVa | X | J | x | x | x | X | x | x | x | NP | x | 8 to 0 | |
| 40 | 5-23/11-30 | Green v Brennan--Title VII S/L | VR | 10 | S | x | X | x | x | x | x | CJ | NP | D | (6+1) to 1 | ||
| 41 | 5-31/3-30 | ArmyCorpsof Eng v Hawkes--APA Clean H20 D | A | 8 | S/J | C | x | CCJ | x | C | X | C | NP | C | (7+1) to 0 | ||
| 42 | 6-6/3-22 | Simmons v Himmelreich--FTCA-Bivens SJ | AR | 6 | J | x | X | x | x | x | x | x | NP | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 43 | 6-6/3-29 | Ross v Blake--§1983 state prisoner procedureD | VR | 4 | X | x | x | C | x | x | x | NP | CCJ | (7+1) to 0 | |||
| 44 | 6-9/2-29 | Williams v PA--duty to recuse 14thDP IFP | VR | SCtPA | X | X | x | x | x | x | X | D | D | NP | D | 5 to 3 | |
| 45 | 6-9/4-26 | Dietz v Bouldin--USDCs' "inherent powers" | A | 9 | J | x | X | x | x | D | x | x | NP | D | 6 to 2 | ||
| 46 | 6-9/1-13 | Puerto Rico v Valle--5thDJ dual sovereignty | A | SCtPR | X | X | X | D | C | D | x | x | x | NP | CCJ | (5+1) to 2 | |
| 47 | 6-13/2-23 | Halo v Pulse--PatentLaw §284 damages 2 | VR | Fed | S | x | x | x | C | C | X | C | NP | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 48 | 6-13/3-22 | Puerto Rico v Franklin Cal--Bkrptcy preemp 2 | A | 1 | S | x | D | D | x | x | x | NP | NP | X | 5 to 2 | ||
| 49 | 6-13/4-19 | US v Bryant--6th tribal-ct convictions predicate | RR | 9 | X | X | x | x | X | x | x | x | x | NP | C | 8 to 0 | |
| 50 | 6-16/2-22 | Kingdomware v US--Art III MuskratVA Ruleof2 | RR | Fed | J/S | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | NP | X | 8 to 0 | ||
| 51 | 6-16/4-19 | UniversalHealth v US ex rel Escobar qui tam D | VR | 1 | S | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | NP | X | 8 to 0 | ||
| 52 | 6-16/4-25 | Kirtsaeng v JohnWiley--§505 fee shifting test | VR | 2 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | NP | x | 8 to 0 | ||
| 53 | 6-20/4-20 | Encino Motor v Navarro--FLSA overtime reg D | VR | 9 | S | x | C | C | x | X | x | D | NP | D | 6 to 2 | ||
| 54 | 6-20/2-22 | Utah v Strieff--4thA attenuation supp motion | R | SCtUT | X | X | D | D | D | x | x | x | x | NP | X | 5 to 3 | |
| 55 | 6-20/4-25 | CuozzoSpeed v Lee--Patent Office procedure | A | Fed | S | x | C,D | x | X | x | x | C,D | NP | C | 6 to 2 | ||
| 56 | 6-20/2-23 | Taylor v US--CCl Hobbs Act robbery IFP | A | 4 | X | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | NP | D | 7 to 1 | ||
| 57 | 6-20/3-21 | RJRNabisco v EEC--RICO, extraterritoriality D | RR | 2 | S | C,D | NP | C,D | C,D | x | x | X | NP | x | 4 to 3 | ||
| 58 | 6-23/12-9 | Fisher v UT-Austin--EP race-admissions SJ | A | 5 | X | NP | x | x | x | X | D | D | NP | D | 4 to 3 | ||
| 59 | 6-23/4-20 | Birchfield v ND--4thA DWI test refulsal stats 3 | RR | SCtND | X | X | x | C,D | C,D | x | x | x | X | NP | D,CJ | 5 to 3 | |
| 60 | 6-23/4-26 | Mathis v US--ACCA violent felonies IFP | R | 8 | S | X | X | x | D | D | C | x | D | NP | C | 5 to 3 | |
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2015) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Ro | Al | Sc | Th | Total | |
| 61 | 6-27/4-27 | McDonnell v US--stat construction | VR | 4 | S | X | x | x | x | x | x | X | x | NP | x | 8 to 0 | |
| 62 | 6-27/3-2 | WholeWomansHealth v Hellerstedt--14thDP | RR | 5 | X | x | x | C | X | x | D | D | NP | D | 5 to 3 | ||
| 63 | 6-27/2-29 | Voisine v US--18:922(g)(9) gun control | A | 1 | S | X | X | D | x | x | x | x | x | NP | D | 6 to 2 | |
| Dec/Arg | Name of Case (October Term 2015) | Disp | L.Ct. | Cn | S/P/J | Cr | Ka | So | Gi | Br | Ke | Ro | Al | Sc | Th | Total | |
| PER CURIAM OPINIONS/DISPOSITIONS | |||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 10-5/0-0 | MD v Kulbicki--6thA | R | MDCA | X | X | |||||||||||
| 2 | 11-9/0-0 | Mullenix v Luna §1983 police liability | R | 5 | D | CJ | |||||||||||
| 3 | 12-14/0-0 | White v Wheeler--excluded juror hc | RR | 6 | X | X | |||||||||||
| 4 | 1-20/1-12 | Duncan v Owens | WDis | 7 | |||||||||||||
| 5 | 1-25/0-0 | James v Boise ID--Martin v Hunter's Lessee | RR | SCtID | X | ||||||||||||
| 6 | 1-25/0-0 | Amgen v Harris--Fifth Third precedent | RR | 9 | |||||||||||||
| 7 | 3-7/0-0 | Wearry v Cain--withheld evidence IFP hc | RR | LADC | X | X | D | D | |||||||||
| 8 | 3-7/0-0 | V.L. v E.L.--gay parents, custody, FF&C Cl | RR | SCtAL | X | ||||||||||||
| 9 | 3-21/0-0 | Caetano v Mass--2dA stun guns | RR | SCtMS | X | X | CJ | CJ | |||||||||
| 10 | 3-22/10-5 | Hawkins v Community Bank | A | 8 | 4 to 4 | ||||||||||||
| 11 | 3-29/1-11 | Friedrichs v Cal Teachers | A | 9 | 4 to 4 | ||||||||||||
| 12 | 4-4/0-0 | Woods v Etherton--6thA anonymous tip hc | R | 6 | X | X | |||||||||||
| 13 | 5-16/3-23 | Zubik v Burwell--health ins contraception 7 | VR | C | C | ||||||||||||
| 14 | 5-16/0-0 | Kernan v Hinojusa--AEDPA IFP hc | R | 9 | X | D | D | ||||||||||
| 15 | 5-31/0-0 | Johnson v Lee--Cal hc procedure upheld hc | RR | 9 | X | ||||||||||||
| 16 | 5-31/0-0 | Lynch v AZ--DP capital case sentencing IFP | RR | SCtAZ | X | X | D | D | |||||||||
| 17 | 6-23/12-7 | Dollar General v Miss Choctaws | A | 5 | 4 to 4 | ||||||||||||
| 18 | 6-23/4-18 | US v TX | A | 5 | 4 to 4 |